A Property Kind Calculus for Measurement Metrology

25.2. The radiant / luminous / photon trios🔗

ISO 80000-7 lists most measurands three times — a radiant (energetic, subscript e) version, a luminous (photopic, subscript v) version, and a photon (count, subscript p) version — and pairs them explicitly ("the corresponding photometric quantity is …"). They are not the same kind of quantity: radiant flux is the total radiant power, luminous flux its V(λ)-weighted response in the human eye, photon flux a count rate. A dimension-only model sees one type, "a real number of watts", for radiant and luminous flux, and cannot say why a count rate is a different thing again.

This is requirement R2 once more — the pattern Part 3 set on the length family, Part 4 on the force family, Part 5 on the thermodynamic potentials, Part 6 on the AC power quantities — now on the radiation trios. Each member is a distinct kind individuated not by fiat but by a radiation mode (Dybkær's examination principle, §7.5). And the trios split two ways: the luminous mode is a dimensionless reweighting (luminous flux ≡ radiant flux in dimension), while the photon mode is a genuine re-dimensioning (photon flux is T⁻¹, not M·L²·T⁻³).

Definition25.2.1
Group: The trio members are individuated by an examination principle — the radiation mode — and (the luminous and radiant members) collide in dimension. The sharpest case is radiant versus luminous flux: both M·L²·T⁻³ , they are nonetheless different kinds, and the calculus proves it from their differing radiation modes, not from a naming convention. (2)
Group member previews
Preview
Theorem 25.2.2
Loading preview
Group member preview content is loaded from the rendered-fragment cache.
Statement uses 2
Statement dependency previews
Preview
Definition 6.4.1
Loading preview
Statement dependency preview content is loaded from the rendered-fragment cache.
used by 0✓L∃∀N

A radiation-mode kind is a ratio-scale quantity-kind carrying an examination principle — this work's terse descriptor of which aspect of the radiation it isolates: the total energetics (subscript e), the V(λ)-weighted photopic response (subscript v), or a photon count (subscript p). The radiant, luminous, and photon members of each measurand's trio differ in this principle.

Lean code for Definition25.2.1●1 definition
  • defdefined in PropertyKindCalculus/Iso80000/Part7.lean
    complete
    def PropertyKindCalculus.Iso80000.Part7.modeKind (id : String)
      (m : PropertyKindCalculus.ExaminationPrinciple)
      (dim : Dimension LTMCTDimensionBase) :
      PropertyKindCalculus.DimensionedKind LTMCTDimensionBase
    def PropertyKindCalculus.Iso80000.Part7.modeKind
      (id : String)
      (m :
        PropertyKindCalculus.ExaminationPrinciple)
      (dim : Dimension LTMCTDimensionBase) :
      PropertyKindCalculus.DimensionedKind
        LTMCTDimensionBase
    A ratio-scale dimensioned kind individuated by its radiation mode (examination
    principle). 
Proof for Definition 25.2.1
uses 0

modeKind id m dim := { kind := { id, scale := .ratio, examPrinciple := some m.id }, dim }, with the three modes RadiationMode.energetic, .photopic, .photonic. The flux trio is radiantFlux / luminousFlux / photonFlux, and likewise for energy, intensity, radiance, irradiance, exitance, and exposure.

Theorem25.2.2
Group: The trio members are individuated by an examination principle — the radiation mode — and (the luminous and radiant members) collide in dimension. The sharpest case is radiant versus luminous flux: both M·L²·T⁻³ , they are nonetheless different kinds, and the calculus proves it from their differing radiation modes, not from a naming convention. (2)
Group member previews
Preview
Definition 25.2.1
Loading preview
Group member preview content is loaded from the rendered-fragment cache.
uses 1used by 0✓L∃∀N

Radiant and luminous flux are distinct kinds — by radiation mode, not by fiat. They share dimension M·L²·T⁻³ and are both "flux", yet are different kinds because one is the total radiant power and the other its V(λ)-weighted photopic response — proved through distinct_of_examPrinciple (§7.5). The photon member is distinct again, and even re-dimensions (T⁻¹). This is the AC-power-family pattern of Part 6 on the radiation trios. Uses the examination principle.

Lean code for Theorem25.2.2●1 theorem
  • theoremdefined in PropertyKindCalculus/Iso80000/Part7.lean
    complete
    theorem PropertyKindCalculus.Iso80000.Part7.radiantFlux_ne_luminousFlux :
      PropertyKindCalculus.Iso80000.Part7.radiantFlux.kind
          LTMCTDimensionBase ≠
        PropertyKindCalculus.Iso80000.Part7.luminousFlux.kind
          LTMCTDimensionBase
    theorem PropertyKindCalculus.Iso80000.Part7.radiantFlux_ne_luminousFlux :
      PropertyKindCalculus.Iso80000.Part7.radiantFlux.kind
          LTMCTDimensionBase ≠
        PropertyKindCalculus.Iso80000.Part7.luminousFlux.kind
          LTMCTDimensionBase
    **Radiant flux and luminous flux are distinct kinds — by radiation mode, not by
    fiat.** They share dimension `M·L²·T⁻³` and are both "flux", yet differ because one is
    the total radiant power and the other its `V(λ)`-weighted photopic response — proved
    through `distinct_of_examPrinciple`. This is the candela's scale-spanning collision (R13)
    realized as a kind distinction. 
Proof for Theorem 25.2.2
uses 0

radiantFlux_ne_luminousFlux : radiantFlux.kind ≠ luminousFlux.kind, from KindOfProperty.distinct_of_examPrinciple on the differing modes radiant-energetic and luminous-photopic-Vlambda. The companions radiantFlux_ne_photonFlux (the photon mode) and radiance_ne_luminance cover further trios; radiantFlux_examinedBy and luminousFlux_examinedBy check the kind-to-mode links. Axiom-free.

Theorem25.2.3
Group: The trio members are individuated by an examination principle — the radiation mode — and (the luminous and radiant members) collide in dimension. The sharpest case is radiant versus luminous flux: both M·L²·T⁻³ , they are nonetheless different kinds, and the calculus proves it from their differing radiation modes, not from a naming convention. (2)
Group member previews
Preview
Definition 25.2.1
Loading preview
Group member preview content is loaded from the rendered-fragment cache.
Statement uses 2
Statement dependency previews
Preview
Definition 10.2.4
Loading preview
Statement dependency preview content is loaded from the rendered-fragment cache.
used by 0✓L∃∀N

The luminous efficacy is dimension one because it is a ratio of two fluxes (item 7-11.1). From K = Φ_v/Φ_e, with luminous and radiant flux of equal dimension (the candela reducing to power), the dimension cancels and the efficacy is computed to be one — the photometric analogue of the power factor (Part 6) and the plane angle (Part 3). The scale coefficient K_cd = 683 lm/W is the candela's scale-spanning constant (R13). Uses the dimension map and the quotient kind-law.

Lean code for Theorem25.2.3●1 theorem
  • theoremdefined in PropertyKindCalculus/Iso80000/Part7/DefiningRelations.lean
    complete
    theorem PropertyKindCalculus.Iso80000.Part7.DefiningRelations.luminousEfficacy_dim_from_fluxes :
      PropertyKindCalculus.Iso80000.Part7.luminousEfficacy.dim
          LTMCTDimensionBase =
        PropertyKindCalculus.Iso80000.Part7.luminousFlux.dim
            LTMCTDimensionBase /
          PropertyKindCalculus.Iso80000.Part7.radiantFlux.dim
            LTMCTDimensionBase
    theorem PropertyKindCalculus.Iso80000.Part7.DefiningRelations.luminousEfficacy_dim_from_fluxes :
      PropertyKindCalculus.Iso80000.Part7.luminousEfficacy.dim
          LTMCTDimensionBase =
        PropertyKindCalculus.Iso80000.Part7.luminousFlux.dim
            LTMCTDimensionBase /
          PropertyKindCalculus.Iso80000.Part7.radiantFlux.dim
            LTMCTDimensionBase
    **The luminous efficacy is dimension one because it is a ratio of two fluxes of equal
    dimension.** Luminous and radiant flux are both `M·L²·T⁻³` (the candela reducing to
    power, R13), so `K = Φ_v/Φ_e` cancels the dimension — the efficacy's dimensionlessness is
    a *checked computation from its defining relation*, the photometric analogue of the power
    factor (IEC 80000-6) and the plane angle (ISO 80000-3). It nonetheless remains a distinct
    kind from every other dimension-one quantity (see `Part7.iso80000_7_dim_one_collision`). 
Proof for Theorem 25.2.3
uses 0

luminousEfficacy_dim_from_fluxes : luminousEfficacy.dim = luminousFlux.dim / radiantFlux.dim, by reducing the right side via div_self (a / a = 1). The kind-law luminousEfficacy_quot_fluxes is ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩; the efficacy nonetheless remains a distinct kind from every other dimension-one quantity (the collision capstone below).